And not But
Under pressure, we move to the edges of a debate. We default to negating the opposing argument. Opposing for opposing's sake. Identity not dialogue. It makes life easy, and avoids the inconvenience of meaningful action. Strike. Protest. Occupy. It sends a signal, and in so doing sends those we're opposing ever deeper into their trenches.
It takes courage to occupy the middle ground, to tell the stories of possibility and find the narratives that engage. That respects those who are afraid to leave the certainty of where they are, and engages the humility of those who want to be somewhere else in recognising they don't yet know what it looks like. It is after all much easier to identify what we don't like than doing the hard yards to build something better and endure the inevitable failures that are part of the path of creating it.
In Improv, there is a central rule. No "buts". only "ands".
"But" brings things to a schreeching halt, whilst "And" maintains the momentum of the dialogue and c…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Outside the Walls to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.